基于生命周期评价的OSB生产环境影响分析

张方文; 张亚慧; 于文吉

doi:10.19455/j.mcgy.20170505

讨论与建议 | 浏览量 : 0 下载量: 91 CSCD: 1

PDF
导出
分享
收藏
专辑

基于生命周期评价的OSB生产环境影响分析
Environmental Impacts of Oriented Strand Board Based on Life Cycle Assessment
1. 中国林科院木材工业研究所
2. 北新建材集团有限公司
2017年31卷第5期页码：22-26
DOI： 10.19455/j.mcgy.20170505

扫描看全文

[1]张方文,张亚慧,于文吉.基于生命周期评价的OSB生产环境影响分析[J].木材工业,2017,31(05):22-26.

ZHANG Fang-wen, ZHANG Ya-hui, YU Wen-ji. Environmental Impacts of Oriented Strand Board Based on Life Cycle Assessment[J]. China Wood Industry, 2017,31(5):22-26.
[1]张方文,张亚慧,于文吉.基于生命周期评价的OSB生产环境影响分析[J].木材工业,2017,31(05):22-26. DOI： 10.19455/j.mcgy.20170505.

ZHANG Fang-wen, ZHANG Ya-hui, YU Wen-ji. Environmental Impacts of Oriented Strand Board Based on Life Cycle Assessment[J]. China Wood Industry, 2017,31(5):22-26. DOI： 10.19455/j.mcgy.20170505.

摘要

基于生命周期评价方法,对我国某OSB企业产品的环境影响进行分析,并与欧洲某OSB企业进行对比。结果表明:我国OSB企业消耗的不可再生能源更多,欧洲OSB企业生产偏向使用清洁的天然气能源;两家OSB企业均采用成套连续化生产线,生产中CO,2,排放量接近;我国企业的OSB产品在其生命周期内,产生的酸化效应、富营养化和全球气候变暖的环境影响值相对较高,臭氧层损耗和光化学烟雾的环境影响值相对较低。

Abstract

Based on Life Cycle Assessment （LCA）, environmental impacts of oriented strand board （OSB） produced by a Chinese company and a European company were evaluated, respectively. Results showed that the Chinese OSB products consumed more non-renewable energy resources while the European OSB products consumed much cleaner energy resources like natural gases. The CO,2, emissions between the two OSB companies were about the same during production. The environmental potential values for acidification, eutrophication and global warming of the Chinese OSB products were higher than those of the European OSB products, but the Chinese OSB products had less impact on ozone depletion and photochemical smog.