古建筑木构件修复加固用环氧树脂性能评价方法研究

韩旭; 黄磊; 王卫滨; 王双永; 周海宾

doi:10.12326/j.2096-9694.2023122

“古建筑木材科研基地”专栏 | 浏览量 : 0 下载量: 0 CSCD: 0

PDF
导出
分享
收藏
专辑

古建筑木构件修复加固用环氧树脂性能评价方法研究
Study on Property Evaluation Method of Epoxy Resin for Repairing and Reinforcing Ancient Building Timber Members
1.中国林业科学研究院木材工业研究所，北京 100091
2.山西省古建筑与彩塑壁画保护研究院，山西太原 030012
2024年38卷第3期页码：1-10
纸质出版日期： 2024-05-30 ，
DOI： 10.12326/j.2096-9694.2023122
稿件说明：

扫描看全文

韩旭,黄磊,王卫滨等.古建筑木构件修复加固用环氧树脂性能评价方法研究[J].木材科学与技术,2024,38(03):1-10.

HAN Xu,HUANG Lei,WANG Weibin,et al.Study on Property Evaluation Method of Epoxy Resin for Repairing and Reinforcing Ancient Building Timber Members[J].Chinese Journal of Wood Science and Technology,2024,38(03):1-10.
韩旭,黄磊,王卫滨等.古建筑木构件修复加固用环氧树脂性能评价方法研究[J].木材科学与技术,2024,38(03):1-10. DOI： 10.12326/j.2096-9694.2023122.

HAN Xu,HUANG Lei,WANG Weibin,et al.Study on Property Evaluation Method of Epoxy Resin for Repairing and Reinforcing Ancient Building Timber Members[J].Chinese Journal of Wood Science and Technology,2024,38(03):1-10. DOI： 10.12326/j.2096-9694.2023122.

摘要

环氧树脂是古建筑木构件修复加固的常用材料，为了科学合理地使用环氧树脂，基于多准则决策理论建立古建筑木构件修复加固用环氧树脂性能评价模型。参考古建筑木构件修复加固工程对环氧树脂的要求与相关标准确定环氧树脂的性能指标集合，采用熵权法与层次分析法分别得到各性能指标客观权重与主观权重，综合主客观权重对各性能指标赋权，使用优序法与逼近理想解排序法（technique for order preference similar to an ideal solution，TOPSIS法）结合各性能指标复合权重构建两种综合性能评价模型。通过验证试验对十组环氧树脂进行综合性能评价，结果表明复合加权TOPSIS综合性能评价模型更全面客观，更适用于古建筑木构件修复加固用环氧树脂，可作为选择和使用环氧树脂的参考方法。

Abstract

Epoxy resin is commonly used for repairing and reinforcing of ancient building timber members. To ensure its scientific and rational application

a performance evaluation model for epoxy resin was established based on multi-criteria decision theory. The evaluation index of the epoxy resin set was determined based on the requirements and relevant standards for repairing and reinforcing wooden components in ancient architecture. The entropy weight method and the analytic hierarchy process were used to obtain each property index's objective weight and subjective weight respectively. The subjective and objective weights were used to weight each property index. Combined with the composite weight

the optimal order method and the TOPSIS (technique for order preference similar to an ideal solution) were used to construct two comprehensive evaluation models. Validation experiments were conducted to evaluate the performance of ten groups of epoxy resins. The results show that the composite weighted TOPSIS comprehensive evaluation model is both more comprehensive and objective

making it better suited for the evaluating epoxy resin comprehensively. This model can serve as a reference method for selecting epoxy resin for repairing and reinforcing ancient buildings.

关键词

古建筑木构件修复加固环氧树脂综合评价方法逼近理想解排序法

Keywords

repairing and reinforcing ancient building timber memberepoxy resincomprehensive evaluation methodtechnique for order preference similar to an ideal solution （TOPSIS）

references

马炳坚. 中国古建筑木作营造技术[M]. 2版. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003.

李铁英, 秦慧敏. 应县木塔现状结构残损分析及修缮探讨[J]. 工程力学, 2005, 22(S1): 199-212.

LI T Y, QIN H M. Damage analysis and repair of Yingxian wooden tower[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2005, 22(S1): 199-212.

秦术杰, 杨娜, 胡浩然, 等. 残损明清古建筑木结构动力特性研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2018, 39(10): 130-137.

QIN S J, YANG N, HU H R, et al. Study on dynamic characteristics of a damaged ancient timber structure of Ming-Qing Dynasty[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2018, 39(10): 130-137.

谢启芳, 张保壮, 张利朋, 等. 自然干裂木柱受力性能试验与退化模型研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2022, 43(12): 210-222.

XIE Q F, ZHANG B Z, ZHANG L P, et al. Study on mechanical performance test and degradation model of naturally cracked timber columns[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2022, 43(12): 210-222.

孟繁兴, 陈国莹. 古建筑保护与研究[M]. 北京: 知识产权出版社, 2006.

FRIGIONE M, LETTIERI M, MECCHI A M. Environmental effects on epoxy adhesives employed for restoration of historical buildings[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2006, 18(5): 715-722.

DELOR-JESTIN F, DROUIN D, CHEVAL P Y, et al. Thermal and photochemical ageing of epoxy resin–Influence of curing agents[J]. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 2006, 91(6): 1247-1255.

XIANG Q, XIAO F P. Applications of epoxy materials in pavement engineering[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 235: 117529.

VIDIL T, TOURNILHAC F, MUSSO S, et al. Control of reactions and network structures of epoxy thermosets[J]. Progress in Polymer Science, 2016, 62: 126-179.

JATO-ESPINO D, CASTILLO-LOPEZ E, RODRIGUEZ-HERNANDEZ J, et al. A review of application of multi-criteria decision making methods in construction[J]. Automation in Construction, 2014, 45: 151-162.

潘毅, 李玲娇, 王慧琴, 等. 木结构古建筑震后破坏状态评估方法研究[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 43(1): 132-142.

PAN Y, LI L J, WANG H Q, et al. Research on evaluation methods for post-earthquake damage state of ancient wooden buildings[J]. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 2016, 43(1): 132-142.

徐帅, 郭小东, 黄瑞乾, 等. 基于层次分析法的古建筑木结构安全性评估方法[J]. 工业建筑, 2016, 46(12): 180-183.

XU S, GUO X D, HUANG R Q, et al. Safety assessment of ancient timber buildings based on analytical hierarchy process[J]. Industrial Construction, 2016, 46(12): 180-183.

郭小东, 付体彪, 徐帅. 基于灰色白化权函数聚类法的木结构古建筑安全性评估[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2017, 43(5): 780-785.

GUO X D, FU T B, XU S. Safety assessment of timber ancient buildings based on grey clustering analytical method[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2017, 43(5): 780-785.

JEE D H, KANG K J. A method for optimal material selection aided with decision making theory[J]. Materials & Design, 2000, 21(3): 199-206.

于海鹏, 陈文帅. 应用AHP评价建筑装饰材料的微环境学特性[J]. 建筑材料学报, 2009, 12(5): 568-574.

YU H P, CHEN W S. Evaluation of interior environment characteristics of building decoration materials with analytic hierarchy process[J]. Journal of Building Materials, 2009, 12(5): 568-574.

陈鹏宇. 线性无量纲化方法对比及反向指标正向化方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(10): 95-101.

CHEN P Y. Comparison of linear normalization methods and the conversion method of reverse indicators[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(10): 95-101.

SAATY T L. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process[J]. Interfaces, 1994, 24(6): 19-43.

蒋洁, 周福林, 钟凯, 等. 基于组合赋权和改进灰色关联分析的电能质量综合评价方法[J]. 电力系统及其自动化学报, 2020, 32(8): 47-53.

JIANG J, ZHOU F L, ZHONG K, et al. Comprehensive evaluation method for power quality based on combinatorial empowerment and improved grey correlation analysis[J]. Proceedings of the CSU-EPSA, 2020, 32(8): 47-53.

遇今, 石柱. 优序法在管理成果评价中的应用[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2000, 22(2): 76-78.

YU J, SHI Z. Order method applied in assessment of management effectiveness[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2000, 22(2): 76-78.

许超, 袁烨. 优序法在工程项目决策和评价中的应用[J]. 工业技术经济, 2005, 24(9): 78-80.

XU C, YUAN Y. Application of priority method in decision-making and evaluation of engineering projects[J]. Industrial Technology & Economy, 2005, 24(9): 78-80.

PATNAIK P K, SWAIN P T R, PUROHIT A. Selection of composite materials for structural applications through MCDM approach[J]. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2019, 18: 3454-3461.

SHANIAN A, SAVADOGO O. TOPSIS multiple-criteria decision support analysis for material selection of metallic bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte fuel cell[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2006, 159(2): 1095-1104.

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

木材表面耐久性超疏水涂层的制备及性能研究

米级透明木单板的制备及性能

环氧树脂填充微波膨化樟子松木材的结构及性能