Chinese Journal of Wood Science and Technology subjects all submitted research articles to the highest standards of peer review: 

At least a Corresponding Editors and two suitably qualified experts review each research article. Editor-in-Chief of the journal makes all publication decisions based on the reviews provided. The Editorial Board Members assist the Editor-in-Chief in decision making on specific submissions. Administrative support for the review process is provided by the Managing Editors. 

Reviewers primarily evaluate the originality, validity and importance of the manuscripts, and provide detailed and evidence-based (with references) comments to help editors to make publication decisions (accept, revise or reject) and authors to make improvements. The following points are considered during the review process. 

1. Is the manuscript suitable for the Journal? Is it original and important?

2. Is the study design appropriate and complete?

3. Are the results and conclusions well-supported?

4. Are there any problems regarding statistics?

5. Are there any ethical issues to be dealt with?