Biological Hazard Prevention and Protection System for Wood Components in Ancient Buildings
- Vol. 37, Issue 1, Pages: 83-90(2023)
DOI: 10.12326/j.2096-9694.2022095
扫 描 看 全 文
1.Research Institute of Wood Industry,Chinese Academy of Forestry,Beijing 100091,China
2.China Cultural Heritage Information and Consulting Center(Data Center of the State Administration of Cultural Heritage),Beijing 100029,China
3.Beijing Designing and Protection Institute of Historic and Cultural Architecture,Beijing 100050,China
4.China Foundation for Cultural Heritage Conservation,Beijing 100009,China
扫 描 看 全 文
马星霞,乔云飞,黎冬青等.古建筑木构件生物危害预防性保护体系框架构建[J].木材科学与技术,2023,37(01):83-90.
MA Xingxia,QIAO Yunfei,LI Dongqing,et al.Biological Hazard Prevention and Protection System for Wood Components in Ancient Buildings[J].Chinese Journal of Wood Science and Technology,2023,37(01):83-90.
木构件是木结构古建筑组成的基本单元和基本要素,木构件因腐朽和虫蛀导致木材降解和力学性能降低,影响木结构建筑安全。建立木构件预防性保护体系,研究预防性保护技术,为延长木构件的在役寿命、保证古建筑结构安全、更好地继承和传承中华古建筑文明奠定基础。本文在综述古建筑木构件的病虫害发生种类、发生原因、发生风险的基础上,从不可移动文物风险管理体系中的风险评估、风险检测、风险预防和应急管理等方面构建我国古建筑木构件生物危害预防性保护体系框架,并围绕生物危害预防性保护框架阐述已有的研究成果,展望未来关键技术研究重点。
China’s ancient buildings are characterized by wooden structures, using a large number of wood components inside. Wood components are the basic units and elements of ancient buildings. The biological properties of wood components are easily rotted by fungi and insects, which shorten service life and affect the safety of wooden structures. The rotted old wood components have to be replaced, resulting in the loss of historical information. Therefore, it is urgent to establish a biological hazard prevention-and-protection system for wood components and develop prevention and protection technologies, in order to prolong the service life of wood components and better inherit Chinese traditional architectural civilization culture. This paper summarizes the information on wood species and reasons and risks of biological hazards of traditional building wood components. The framework of biological hazard prevention-and-protection system was proposed for ancient building wood components in China on the basis of the risk management system of immovable cultural heritage against natural hazards with risk assessment, risk monitoring, risk prevention, and emergency management. At last, the further research focusing on the prevention and protection is also discussed.
古建筑木构件生物危害生物风险风险管理预防性保护
ancient buildingswood componentsbiological hazardbiological riskrisk managementprevention-and-protection system
陈君子, 周勇, 刘大均. 中国古建筑遗产时空分布特征及成因分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2018, 32(2): 194-200.
CHEN J Z, ZHOU Y, LIU D J. Analysis of spatio-temporal distribution characteristics of ancient architecture heritage in China[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2018, 32(2): 194-200.
林徽因. 中国建筑常识[M]. 北京:北京理工大学出版社, 2017.
马星霞, 王艳华, 贺大龙. 古建筑木结构病害与保护[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社, 2021.
陈允适. 古建筑木结构与木质文物保护[M]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2007.
李宏松. 不可移动文物自然灾害风险管理体系研究[J]. 自然与文化遗产研究, 2021, 6(2): 50-59.
LI H S. Study on the risk management system of immovable cultural heritage against natural hazards[J]. Study on Natural and Cultural Heritage, 2021, 6(2): 50-59.
乔云飞. 不可移动文物自然灾害风险管理研究[J]. 中国文化遗产, 2021(4): 4-11.
马星霞, 蒋明亮, 李志强. 木材生物降解与保护[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社, 2011.
王平, 马星霞, 吕慧梅, 等. 西藏三大重点文物木结构防腐防虫技术(一) [J]. 木材工业,2011,25(6): 44-47.
WANG P, MA X X, LYU H M, et al. Preservation of wood structure in major ancient buildings in Tibet (part I)[J]. China Wood Industry, 2011, 25(6): 44-47.
李小荣.吉林省公主岭市的白蚁危害改写了我国白蚁分布的北界[J].城市害虫防治,2012 (1) : 35-37.
贺春玲, 朱朝东, 吴燕如. 木蜂属分类学研究概况[J]. 生物学通报, 2014, 49(7): 1-3.
马星霞, 王麟, 乔云飞, 等. 基于木蜂筑巢习性的古建筑木构件木蜂危害等级划分研究[J]. 林业科学,2022,58(3): 167-174.
MA X X, WANG L, QIAO Y F, et al. Evaluation of damage grades for wooden components of ancient buildings based on nesting habits of carpenter bee[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(3): 167-174.
马星霞, 王麟, 朱海燕, 等. 全国木结构古建筑木蜂危害风险区域划分[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(4): 116-123.
MA X X, WANG L, ZHU H Y, et al. Risk zones of carpenter bees for wooden structure of ancient buildings in China[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(4): 116-123.
凌程建, 肖承波, 吴体, 等. 优秀历史建筑典型破坏及原因分析[J]. 四川建筑科学研究,2010, 36(4): 1-8.
吴建国, 庞正平, 陈鎛尧. 房屋木构件制品害虫危害及其防治[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械, 2002, 8(4): 43-45.
WU J G, PANG Z P, CHEN B Y. Pest infestation and control in wood furniture in buildings[J]. Chinese Journal of Hygienic Insecticides of Equipments, 2002, 8(4): 43-45.
Scheffer T. A climate index for estimating potential for decay in wood structures above ground[J]. Forest Products Journal, 1971, 21: 25-31.
GB/T 33041—2016,中国陆地木材腐朽与白蚁危害等级区域划分[S].
GB/T 27651—2011,防腐木材的使用分类和要求[S].
王卫滨, 叶若琛, 乔慧芳, 等. 长治长子小张碧云寺主殿若干问题探讨[J]. 木材科学与技术, 2022, 36(3): 72-79.
WANG W B, YE R C, QIAO H F, et al. Research on several issues about main hall of Xiaozhang biyun temple in Changzhi City[J]. Chinese Journal of Wood Science and Technology, 2022, 36(3): 72-79.
李世民, 王梦丹, 黄斌, 等. 建水指林寺大殿木构件材种鉴定及配置研究[J]. 文物保护与考古科学, 2020, 32(3): 91-98.
LI S M, WANG M D, HUANG B, et al. Identification of species and investigation of allocation of wood components in the hall of Zhilin Temple in Jianshui County[J]. Sciences of Conservation and Archaeology, 2020, 32(3): 91-98
孟阳, 陈薇. 中国古代木构建筑营造如何用木[J]. 建筑学报, 2019 (10):41-45.
MENG Y, CHEN W. The use of wood in historical Chinese timber buildings[J]. Architectural Journal, 2019(10): 41-45.
“故宫古建筑木构件树种配置模式研究”课题组. 故宫武英殿建筑群木构件树种及其配置研究[J]. 故宫博物院院刊, 2007, 132(4): 6-27.
Research Group on Wood Species Configuration Mode of Ancient Architecture Wooden Members in the Forbidden City. Study on wood species and configuration of wood members in Wuying Hall of the Forbidden City[J]. Palace Museum Journal, 2007, 132(4): 6-27.
刘波, 付跃进, 马星霞, 等. 木材生物病害严重区域古建筑木构件树种选择及与生物病害的关系[J]. 林业科学,2021,57(12): 108-121.
LIU B, FU Y J, MA X X, et al. Relationship between wood species selection and biological diseases of ancient building wooden components in severe wood biological diseases area[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(12): 108-121.
LY/T 2146—2013,古建筑木构件的非破坏性检测方法及腐朽分级[S].
GB/T 28990—2012,古建筑木构件内部腐朽与弹性模量应力波无损检测规程[S].
黄荣凤,伍艳梅,李华, 等. 古建筑旧木材腐朽状况皮罗钉检测结果的定量分析[J]. 林业科学,2010,46(10): 114-118.
HUANG R F, WU Y M, LI H, et al. Quantitative analysis of decaying detected by pilodyn in wood of ancient architecture[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2010, 46(10): 114-118.
黄荣凤,王晓欢,李华, 等. 古建筑木材内部腐朽状况阻力仪检测结果的定量分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2007,29(6): 167-171.
HUANG R F, WANG X H, LI H, et al. Quantitative analysis on the detected results by resistograph on inside wood decay of ancient architecture[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2007, 29(6): 167-171.
常丽红,钱威,常浩等.应力波对木构件内部空洞的检测[J]. 木材科学与技术, 2022, 36(4): 70-76.
CHANG L H, QIAN W, CHANG H, et al. Detection of internal voids in wooden components by stress waves[J]. Chinese Journal of Wood Science and Technology, 2022, 36(4): 70-76.
MA X X, GRANT T, CAROL A, et al. Modulus of elasticity loss as a rapid indicator of rot-fungal attack on untreated and preservative-treated wood in laboratory tests[J]. Bioresources. 2017, 12(1): 1850-1860.
王平,马星霞,吕慧梅, 等. 西藏三大重点文物木结构防腐防虫技术(二) [J]. 木材工业,2012,26(1): 51-54.
WANG P, MA X X, LYU H M, et al. Preservation of wood structure in major ancient buildings in Tibet(part Ⅱ)[J]. China Wood Industry, 2012, 26(1): 51-54.
GB/T 50165—2020, 古建筑木结构维护与加固技术标准[S].
张景朋,蒋明亮,马星霞, 等. 甲氧基丙烯酸酯类制剂的木材防腐性能研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2021, 43(3): 131-137.
ZHANG J P, JIANG M L, MA X X, et al. Wood decay performance of strobilurins preservatives[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(3): 131-137.
张斌,马星霞,蒋明亮, 等. 古建筑木构件有机型防腐防虫剂制备及其效果[J]. 林业科学,2021, 57(8): 167-175.
ZHANG B, MA X X, JIANG M L, et al. Preparation and effect evaluation of organic preservative for ancient buildings wood biodeterioration[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(8): 167-175.
张斌,马星霞,张景朋等. 含石蜡水基型有机木材保护复合制剂的性能研究[J]. 浙江农林大学学报,2022, 39(2): 423-429.
ZHANG B, MA X X, ZHANG J P, et al. Preparation and properties of containing paraffin water based organic wood protective agent[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2022, 39(2): 423-429.
郭桂香. 从创新成果管窥文物科技保护发展趋势[J]. 文物保护与考古科学, 2022, 34(1): 126-132.
GUO G X. Overview of the development trend of cultural relic conservation in a sci-tech way from innovative achievements[J]. Sciences of Conservation and Archaeology, 2022, 34(1): 126-132.
相关作者
相关机构