Study on Seismic Performance of Straight Tenon-type Joints in Chuan-dou Style Timber Structure
- Vol. 36, Issue 1, Pages: 57-62(2022)
DOI: 10.12326/j.2096-9694.2021060
扫 描 看 全 文
1.Research Institute of Wood Industry,Chinese Academy of Forestry,Beijing 100091,China
2.School of Civil Engineering,Beijing Jiaotong University,Beijing 100044,China
扫 描 看 全 文
王双永,郭婷,邓昊等.穿斗式木结构直榫边节点承载性能试验研究[J].木材科学与技术,2022,36(01):57-62.
WANG Shuang-yong,GUO Ting,DENG Hao,et al.Study on Seismic Performance of Straight Tenon-type Joints in Chuan-dou Style Timber Structure[J].Chinese Journal of Wood Science and Technology,2022,36(01):57-62.
以传统民居穿斗式木结构直榫边节点为研究对象,分析节点承载机制,并设计制作3套杉木结构直榫边节点足尺试件(对照组1套、扒钉加固1套、角钢加固1套),进行低周往复加载试验。研究结果表明:直榫边节点破坏模式主要表现为节点木材横纹压屈变形和节点拔榫,滞回曲线轮廓均呈反“Z”形状,且呈现较明显的捏缩现象。与未加固节点相比,加固节点的承载性能均有所提高;扒钉加固节点在扒钉脱落失效前提高了节点刚度、累积耗能及变形能力,角钢加固节点在穿枋断裂前显著提高了节点刚度、累积耗能及变形能力。
The Chuan-dou joints of traditional residential timber structures were studied in this research project. The bearing mechanism of joints were analyzed. Three sets of full-scale test specimens of the straight tenon-type joints of the Chuan-dou style timber structure were designed and produced: one set was as the control group, the second set was reinforced with nails, and the third set was reinforced with angle steels. Cyclic loading tests were conducted. The results showed that the failure mode of the straight tenon-type joint was mainly caused by the partial compressive plastic deformation perpendicular to the grain and the pull-out of tenon. All of the hysteretic curves were in the reverse "Z" shape, and showed distinct pinch phenomena. Compared with the control group, the load-bearing performance of reinforced joints were improved. The nail-reinforced joints improved the stiffness, energy dissipation, and the deformation capacity before the nails fell off. The angle-steel reinforced joints significantly improved the stiffness, energy dissipation, and the deformation capacity before the girder fractured.
穿斗式木结构直榫边节点加固承载性能
Chuan-dou style timber structurestraight tenon-type jointsreinforcementseismic performance
郭婷, 杨娜, 周海宾, 等.西南传统民居性能研究进展与发展建议[J].木材工业, 2020, 34(3): 48-51.
GUO T, YANG N, ZHOU H B, et al. Research progress on performance of traditional dwellings in southwest China[J]. China Wood Industry, 2020, 34(3): 48-51.
李佩. 穿斗式木结构榫卯连接抗震性能试验研究[D].重庆: 重庆大学, 2016.
薛建阳, 任国旗, 许丹, 等. 传统民居穿斗式木结构栓榫节点抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报, 2019, 40(10):158-167.
XUE J Y, REN G Q, XU D, et al. Experimental study on seismic performance of dowel joints in traditional Chuan-Dou style timber structures[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2019, 40(10): 158-167.
谢启芳, 郑培君, 向伟, 等.古建筑木结构直榫节点抗震性能试验研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2015, 35(3): 232-240.
XIE Q F, ZHENG P J, XIANG W, et al. Experimental study on seismic behavior of straight mortise-tenon joints of ancient timber buildings[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2015, 35(3): 232-240.
谢启芳, 王龙, 郑培君, 等.传统木结构单向直榫节点转动弯矩-转角关系理论分析[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 44(7): 111-117.
XIE Q F, WANG L, ZHENG P J, et al. Theoretical analysis on moment-rotation relationship of straight mortise-tenon joints for Chinese traditional wooden buildings[J]. Journal of Hunan University(Natural Sciences), 2017, 44(7): 111-117.
王双永, 郭婷, 邓昊, 等. 穿斗式木结构榫卯节点加固的抗震性能研究[J].木材科学与技术, 2021, 35(1): 36-41.
WANG S Y, GUO T, DENG H, et al. Study on seismic performance of mortise-tenon reinforcement joints in chuan-dou style timber structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Wood Science and Technology, 2021,35(1):36-41.
GB/T 1928—2009, 木材物理力学试验方法总则[S].
GB/T 1929—2009, 木材物理力学试材锯解及试样截取方法[S].
GB/T 1931—2009, 木材含水率测定方法[S].
GB/T 1933—2009, 木材密度测定方法[S].
GB/T 1935—2009, 木材顺纹抗压强度试验方法[S].
GB/T 1938—2009, 木材顺纹抗拉强度试验方法[S].
GB/T 1936.1—2009, 木材抗弯强度试验方法[S].
GB/T 1936.2—2009, 木材抗弯弹性模量测定方法[S].
GB/T 1939—2009, 木材横纹抗压试验方法[S].
DIN EN 12512-2005, Timber structures - Test methods - Cyclic testing of joints made with mechanical fasteners [S].
聂雅雯,陶忠. 黏弹性阻尼器增强传统木结构半榫节点试验研究[J].建筑结构,2021,51(1):107-113.
NIE Y W, TAO Z. Experimental study on half mortise-tenon joints with viscoelastic dampers reinforced in traditional timber structure [J]. Building Structure, 2021,51(1):107-113.
相关作者
相关机构